In the ongoing Aruba hacking blackmail rape case defense, the lawyer representing suspect D.E. has strongly opposed the prosecution’s demand for a five-year prison sentence, calling it excessive and unjustified.
Defense attorney Mr. Illes argued in court that the requested punishment does not adequately consider the accused’s mental health condition, as previously highlighted by both a psychologist and a psychiatrist. According to the defense, these evaluations indicate that the suspect has reduced responsibility for his actions.
Addressing the most serious allegation, the defense stated that there is no evidence of rape. The lawyer maintained that the sexual encounter between the suspect and the alleged victim was consensual and insisted that the court should acquit D.E. of this charge. He also argued that the victim’s compensation claim should be handled through a civil case rather than within the criminal proceedings.
In the Aruba hacking blackmail rape case defense, the lawyer also challenged the hacking accusations, claiming that the suspect does not possess the technical knowledge required to carry out such actions. While acknowledging that D.E. admitted to wrongdoing, the defense emphasized that his actions should be judged within the context of his mental condition.
The court was informed that the suspect is currently under special supervision in detention to prevent self-harm. The defense further argued that the prison environment is not providing adequate treatment and that the prolonged duration of the case should also be taken into account.
Mr. Illes stressed that treatment, rather than extended imprisonment, would be more effective in addressing the suspect’s behavior. He urged the court to reduce the sentence and prioritize rehabilitation.
The judge has closed the hearing and indicated that more time is needed to review the case. A final decision in the Aruba hacking blackmail rape case defense is expected on April 24, 2026.
